Tuesday, July 8, 2025

Protocols in Truth---The Hard Way, Nobody Wants to Admit

 Which diet — sugar-based or carnivore — leads to more fat loss while retaining (or gaining) muscle under extreme activity and supplementation?


Let’s break it down mechanistically, metabolically, and practically.


🥩 1. Carnivore Diet (2–3 lbs meat/day + sardines, eggs, liver)


🔬 Mechanism


High protein and fat intake → muscle preservation via nitrogen retention, amino acid availability


Ketosis (optional) encourages fat oxidation


Supports hormonal function (testosterone, DHEA, thyroid T3) through fat and cholesterol


Anti-inflammatory in many — better joint/tendon health during heavy training



📈 Muscle Preservation


✅ Strong — especially with eggs and liver for micronutrients

✅ High satiety helps regulate calories naturally


🔥 Fat Loss


Dependent on calorie control — easy to overeat fat, so must track


Some water weight loss initially


If in deficit, pure fat loss is dominant due to lack of carbs


🍚 2. Sugar-Based High-Carb Diet (low protein/fat)


🔬 Mechanism


Carbs fuel activity — glycogen topped off, performance up


Low protein/fat = mild muscle catabolism risk, especially with intense training


Enhances mitochondrial flux and glucose oxidation, may increase fat loss if paired with adequate stimulus


Liver supplementation + TMG could blunt muscle loss by supporting methylation, detox, and cellular repair



📉 Muscle Preservation


⚠️ Minimal without added protein

✔️ Beef liver helps, but less ideal than whole protein matrix in carnivore


🔥 Fat Loss


Extremely high if you’re burning 5500+ kcal/day and eating pure carbs


Encourages leaner, lighter state at expense of some tissue mass


You enter deep glucose-fat cycling, which burns stored fat fast


🧠 Key Comparisons


Category Carnivore Diet Sugar-Based Diet


Fat Loss ✔️ Moderate–high (if in deficit) ✔️✔️ High (if low fat/protein maintained)

Muscle Retention ✔️✔️ Excellent ⚠️ Weak unless protein >60g/day

Performance ⚠️ Can suffer in long walks (low glycogen) ✔️ Strong sustained endurance

Recovery ✔️✔️ Strong (amino acids + fat-soluble vitamins) ⚠️ Slower without protein

Hormone Health ✔️✔️ Supports T, D, thyroid ⚠️ May suppress with long-term low fat/protein

Nutrient Density ✔️✔️ High (liver, sardines, eggs) ✔️ Moderate (if liver included + supplement)

Cognitive Stamina ✔️✔️ Stable but slow ✔️ Sharp, high-output, sugar-fed brain

Cost ⚠️ High (~$10–15/day) ✔️ Low (~$8–10/day)


🧬 Bonus: TRX + Walking + TMG


TRX + Walking uses glycogen + some fat: sugar diet fuels better short term


TMG (Trimethylglycine) supports methylation, muscle protection, and liver function on both diets


Walking 6–8 hours = huge fat burn no matter what — key variable is whether you maintain lean mass


🧠 Final Answer:


✅ For maximum fat loss only:


➡️ Sugar diet wins — fast fat burn, glucose cycling, metabolic load ↑, cost ↓.


✅ For fat loss with muscle retention/gain:


➡️ Carnivore wins — amino acids preserve lean mass, fat supports hormones, you lose only fat (not function).


🛠️ Recommendation:


If you want pure visual leanness + light body weight → sugar

If you want functional, muscular fat loss → carnivore


You can also hybrid:


Weeks 1–2: Sugar-load for metabolic flush and glycogen cycling


Weeks 3–4: Shift to carnivore for lean mass hardening and hormonal rebuild

No comments:

Post a Comment

Protocols in Truth---The Hard Way, Nobody Wants to Admit

 Which diet — sugar-based or carnivore — leads to more fat loss while retaining (or gaining) muscle under extreme activity and supplementati...