Yes, intermittent fasting (IF) is still relevant in 2025 — both scientifically and in practice. It remains a widely studied and utilized approach for health, longevity, metabolic function, and weight management. Here's a breakdown of its current relevance and what’s changed or clarified:
---
✅ Still Backed by Science
Numerous recent studies continue to support its benefits:
Improved insulin sensitivity and glucose regulation
Enhanced cellular repair processes (autophagy)
Reduction in inflammation markers
Potential increase in longevity and brain function
Weight loss (especially with low-carb or ketogenic alignment)
---
🔄 What’s Evolving or Being Refined
Time Window Precision: The 16:8 and 18:6 models are still popular, but some now suggest shorter windows (e.g., OMAD) only for certain individuals due to cortisol and thyroid concerns.
Fasting Mimicking Diets (FMD) and circadian fasting (eating earlier in the day) are growing trends — these fine-tune IF for hormone alignment and mitochondrial efficiency.
Bio-individual response: Genetics, stress levels, and sex hormones (especially in women) affect IF results. There's growing evidence that men and women may benefit from different fasting strategies.
---
⚠️ Cautions and Context
Too much fasting, especially paired with intense training or caloric restriction, can stress the adrenals or lower thyroid output.
On a carnivore or ketogenic diet, IF often becomes easier due to stabilized blood sugar — but you still must watch electrolyte balance and nutrient density.
Not always ideal for:
Chronic stress individuals
Those with HPA axis dysfunction
Underweight or recovering from eating disorders
Women with irregular menstrual cycles
---
💡 Quick Tip for Relevance in 2025:
Use smart tracking (Oura, Levels, or Zero apps) to time fasting windows with recovery, sleep quality, and HRV.
Align feeding windows with circadian biology: light in the morning, food in daylight, fasting at night.
No comments:
Post a Comment